| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Low Traffic Neighbourhoods | |
| Posted by: | Ossian Olsén | |
| Date/Time: | 21/09/20 20:17:00 |
| Rosco, I should really not re engage you, I found your comment about my surname ignorant and flippant. But I had missed this post and it is an odd one. You claim to ask a question when you don’t (last sentences). I believe data, yes. I am an engineer and I am actually relatively good with data. What we are talking about here is relatively basic and, no, you cannot manipulate simple traffic data to fit a purpose. Walthamstow counted the cars, the measured the speeds and counted accidents. If your argument is that Walthamstow and Ealing colluded to provide fake evidence that a LTN reduces traffic to an area - that can be the case, sure, but how would you know and how would you prove it? If you cannot act up claims on this forum with any stats, how do you know that the two Burroughs are lying? Just because the ignorant and uniformed posts on this forum are normally not challenged does not give an authority to being ignorant and ignoring facts. You can probably tell that I feel strongly about facts and this scheme is positive from a traffic to the area perspective, but if you don’t believe data and facts (or believe that they are fake data and facts) you have a bigger issue than can be discussed and resolved here. Finally another one of your comments that appears to suggest I am not as experienced and knowledgeable about all matters love. I am not sure if six years resident here and 8 years in chiswick is a long term or newly arrived - but more importantly, what does that matter? It doesn’t change facts. |