CASE OFFICER SITE VISIT: In my previous posting, I mentioned how I believe it is very important for a planning case officer when assessing an Application and how it could affect adjoining and neighbouring residents to actually come and view the application land from various vantage points.
In this case, the proposed Company's business is already being promoted on the Web. The Director/Chairman, Ms Angela Edmondson has said in her podcast interview that paying £5,000 a month would save the authorities spending £50,000 a month to have a parent held in prison and her child put into care. Obviously, this is a very lucrative operation generating huge sums of money - at the expense of neighbours whose properties will become unsaleable and may well be driven out of their homes where they have lived for over 40 years in some cases. Some families originally leased their homes from The Goldsmiths' Company in the late 20's later buying their freeholds after the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.
COVENANT: When purchasers bought their homes, they would have been made aware by their solicitors that the property was subject to the Goldsmiths' restrictions requiring each dwellinghouse be used as a private residence and that nothing should be done or the land (or allowed to be done) that may be an "Annoyance" to other tenants/owners on the Estate.
Having purchased their homes and undertaken to observe these restrictions in the knowledge that others had also done so and more would be doing the same, it seems unfair that a planning officer, who may have little knowledge of the Estate and who may care about it even less, should seek to undermine what has been in place for 80 years or more.
NON-DISCLOSURE OF TRUE INTENDED USE: The covenant is a right that neighbours can enforce themselves whether not the Planning Department are promoting a use prohibited by the covenant. A use which the Planning Department were told not to disclose to the residents and which they went along with the bare "sui generis" letter giving no details of the true intended use.
As I wrote before, I am amazed at this conspiracy by the Council, given the finding of the Local Government Ombudsman in the 1991 Complaint upheld finding Ealing Council guilty of MALADMINISTRATION in the No.18 Freeland Road case, when residents were deliberately kept in the dark about the proposals by EFHA to use the dwellinghouse as an Ex-Offenders Hostel and then the Committee was told that there were no objections (apart from a request to move the position of the waste bins!).
I have been told by a personal family friend of Mrs Sadia Wahid that she was unaware of what the caretaker, Mr Ayub, had apparently arranged with Ms Edmondson i.e. that from 8th September 2011, the two dwellinghouses would be taken over by Lease by DiversityInCare Limited (i.e. the next day after the planning permission which Ms Edmondson had been counting on and, it appears, had already considered "a done deal" since she has been advertising the premises on the Web in some detail well before 7th September 2011).
NURSERY BUILDING TO BE ERECTED: One prominent feature of the publicity is the "Nursery Building" (to be staffed 24 Hours Day & Night, 365 Days a Year) and which is to be erected in the back garden of the Hostel.
The only problem is - the poorly presented Plans & Drawings do not reveal this aspect of the development anywhere in any of the inadequate Plans/Drawings, that the case officer, Mr Andrew Vaughan appears to have been happy to accept without question.
Normally, the Council is stringent on requiring properly detailed Plans. The Plans put in by Ms Edmondson's Company do not even show the full extent of the two properties and their gardens (where there are some mature trees in No.55) or the boundaries with adjoining houses in Friars Place Lane and Gibbon Road behind.
The combined properties are not to be used as a private dwellinghouse only and therefore, even under the planning system, there is no "permitted development" and thus, the proposed 24 Hours Nursery Building for 10 Children and Day & Night Staff requires planning permission and this building should be shown on the Plans and in addition, there should be proper Elevation Plans of it. We don't know the width, length or height of the Nursery Building - we don't know where it is to be built? Are the trees to be felled? None of this information is provided - this is all contrary to the Government's "Guidance on Information Requirements and Validation".
Of course, whilst the residents were kept in the dark and misled and the Council given false documents, the Planning Department is fully aware of all of the details of this proposed Hostel (details which they were asked by Ms Edmondson to keep secret). The Planning Department did not attempt to seek proper Plans from the developers nor did they even enquire as to the missing Plans for the back garden Nursery Building, which is obviously INTEGRAL to the proposed development.
The complete omission of this main element of the proposed development (which stretches over two original Goldsmiths' plots) means that the Planning Department cannot have assessed the impact on the many immediately adjoining neighbours either side of Nos. 53 and 55 and at the rear in Gibbon Road.
WHY?: The conduct of the Planning Department in accepting Certificates and Plans that have been shown to be unlawful and totally inadequate remains baffling!
The Planning Department do know that there is a restrictive covenant which would prevent this development (a development which Mrs Sadia Wahid the registered owner of No.53, living in Pakistan, was apparently completely unaware of), yet they seem to be going out of their to try to push this through by any means, effectively encouraging or inducing Ms Edmondson to try to break the covenants (opposed by The Goldsmiths' Company and hundreds of residents from neighbouring homes in Friars Place Lane, Perryn Road, Vyner Road, Bowes Road, East Acton Lane, etc), which is likely to involve not only Ms Edmondson's Company "DiversityInCare Limited" but also the two landowners (Majid Hameed and Sadia Wahid, both living in Pakistan) in High Court litigation.
It was only when the superior officer mentioned in an earlier posting finally looked at the papers on 5th September 2011 and reported his findings to the Environment Group Director (Mr Noel Rutherford) that he had found no less than 7 defects in the Application papers, that finally, the Council declared the Application to be INVALID (as we had been telling them all along).
But even then, Mr Andrew Vaughan seems to have wanted to "revive" it by producing an "alternative" Ownership Certificate/Notice. This was however rejected by the superior officer in a final note to the Director on 5th September 2011. This all took place 3 days after the Head of Planning herself (Ms Aileen Jones) rejected my valid and law-based complaint about the unlawful status of the Application and she ruled that the case must go forward to Committee on 7th September 2011 in accordance with Mr Vaughan's favourable report granting planning permission.
As we now know, Ms Jones, The Head of Planning, was overruled by the Legal Department in her absence.
FAMILIES DRIVEN OUT: I firmly believe that if this development were to be allowed to go ahead, it would drive out the families of the adjoining private residences at Nos. 51 and 57.
On a forced sale, their homes would have to be heavily discounted since what family in their right mind would wish to move in next door to premises to be used as some kind of an "open prison" with drug addicts, sex workers, mental patients and ex-offenders or persons on licence from the Home Office/Prison Service, etc operating 24 Hours a Day - and even in the back garden!
I suspect that the only buyers for the homes would be other business/institutional companies and we could end up with a block of 4 such institutional-type uses at Nos. 51, 53, 55 & 57. With rear extensions, basements, roof conversions, more nursery buildings, each of the former dwellinghouses could accommodate temporary accommodation up to 20 persons + children, so we could have up to 80 ex-offenders, etc. in what was once four family homes protected by covenants.
The developers' original Location OS Map showed 4 houses as the application land! A wished-for prophecy perhaps on the part of Ms Edmondson?
With 4 houses gone to Hostels and HalfWay Houses, the developers assisted by the Planning Department could then try to argue that it is the private family homes nearby that are "out of character" in this stretch of road on the Estate and so perhaps No. 47 and No. 59 could be added in to the list, providing six Hostels and so on.
Fortunately, in this instance - on this Estate, I think you will find that those promoting this unwelcome development against the clearly expressed wishes of the local community may not have the last word.
Victor.Mishiku
"The Covenant Movement" 11/9/11.
|
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!! | 30/08/11 21:10:00 | Elena Enn |
| Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!! | 30/08/11 21:49:00 | Nicola Howard |
| Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!! | 30/08/11 21:50:00 | Elena Enn |
| Re:Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!! | 30/08/11 22:10:00 | Nicola Howard |
| Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!! | 30/08/11 22:15:00 | Jacqueline Davis |
| Re:Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!! | 31/08/11 08:28:00 | Nigel Williams |
| Re:Re:Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!! | 31/08/11 13:00:00 | Nicola Howard |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!! | 31/08/11 13:27:00 | Sarah Harris |
| Invalid Application - Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!! | 31/08/11 14:34:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:Invalid Application - Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!! | 31/08/11 15:07:00 | Sarah Harris |
| Re:Invalid Application - Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!! | 31/08/11 15:07:00 | Sarah Harris |
| Goldsmiths' Acton Estate - Acton Residents Unrepresented. | 01/09/11 10:45:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:Goldsmiths' Acton Estate - Acton Residents Unrepresented. | 01/09/11 14:22:00 | joseph birotz |
| Re:Re:Goldsmiths' Acton Estate - Acton Residents Unrepresented. | 01/09/11 15:02:00 | Sarah Harris |
| Re:Re:Re:Goldsmiths' Acton Estate - Acton Residents Unrepresented. | 01/09/11 15:55:00 | joseph birotz |
| Re:Re:Goldsmiths' Acton Estate - Acton Residents Unrepresented. | 01/09/11 17:24:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:Re:Re:Goldsmiths' Acton Estate - Acton Residents Unrepresented. | 02/02/12 21:05:00 | kathy kennelly |
| SITE VISIT - Invalidity of the Application - | 02/09/11 18:45:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!! | 01/09/11 20:48:00 | Charles Chara |
| SITE VISIT Tomorrow Morning 9.10am 3rd September | 02/09/11 18:47:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:SITE VISIT Tomorrow Morning 9.10am 3rd September | 03/09/11 13:35:00 | Hasan Ukra |
| Re: SITE VISIT - 3rd September | 03/09/11 15:45:00 | Pavlos Dora |
| Re:Re: SITE VISIT - 3rd September | 03/09/11 17:22:00 | Lesley Russell |
| Re:Re:Re: SITE VISIT - 3rd September | 03/09/11 18:22:00 | Nicola Howard |
| Re:Re:Re:Re: SITE VISIT - 3rd September | 03/09/11 22:51:00 | Brijesh Chauhan |
| Post Site Visit comment | 04/09/11 12:03:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Post Site Visit comment (corrected) | 04/09/11 12:09:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Weblink E-Mail 4/9/11. | 04/09/11 14:42:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:Post Site Visit comment | 04/09/11 16:24:00 | Louisa Asker |
| Re:Re: SITE VISIT - 3rd September | 05/09/11 10:32:00 | Hasan Ukra |
| Re:Re:SITE VISIT Tomorrow Morning 9.10am 3rd September | 05/09/11 09:45:00 | Deborah Patellaro |
| 1,100 Objections lodged at the Council! | 04/09/11 21:53:00 | Charles Chara |
| Peaceful Acton neighbourhood | 04/09/11 22:09:00 | Charles Chara |
| Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!! | 05/09/11 16:46:00 | The Editor |
| MEETINGS - still on. | 05/09/11 20:14:00 | Elena Nutkins |
| Withdrawn Application - What a surprise! | 06/09/11 09:38:00 | Elena Nutkins |
| Re:Withdrawn Application - What a surprise! | 06/09/11 10:12:00 | Sara Nathan |
| Re:Re:Withdrawn Application - What a surprise! | 06/09/11 10:29:00 | Hasan Ukra |
| Re:Re:Re:Withdrawn Application - What a surprise! | 06/09/11 11:43:00 | Dee Cook |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Withdrawn Application - What a surprise! | 06/09/11 12:53:00 | Elena Nutkins |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Withdrawn Application - What a surprise! | 06/09/11 16:20:00 | Hasan Ukra |
| The Covenant | 06/09/11 16:01:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:The Covenant | 06/09/11 16:25:00 | Dee Cook |
| The Covenant | 06/09/11 19:02:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| planning committee, ref;53=55 FPL | 06/09/11 22:48:00 | Hani Ukra |
| Planning Department overruled by Legal Services | 07/09/11 00:12:00 | Charles Chara |
| Re:planning committee, ref;53=55 FPL | 07/09/11 08:35:00 | Elena Nutkins |
| Re:Re:planning committee, ref;53=55 FPL | 07/09/11 11:14:00 | Hasan Ukra |
| Re:Re:Re:planning committee, ref;53=55 FPL | 07/09/11 16:02:00 | M ODonald |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:planning committee, ref;53=55 FPL | 07/09/11 18:56:00 | Nicola Howard |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:planning committee, ref;53=55 FPL | 07/09/11 22:54:00 | Iain Muir |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:planning committee, ref;53=55 FPL | 08/09/11 13:37:00 | geoffrey berg |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:planning committee, ref;53=55 FPL | 08/09/11 14:40:00 | Nicola Howard |
| Residents' efforts rewarded | 08/09/11 17:04:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Correction :Residents' efforts rewarded | 08/09/11 17:05:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:planning committee, ref;53=55 FPL | 08/09/11 20:30:00 | Lesley Russell |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:planning committee, ref;53=55 FPL | 08/09/11 21:38:00 | Nicola Howard |
| False Certificate - Ownership Details, etc | 08/09/11 22:52:00 | Charles Chara |
| I agree - Charles C. | 08/09/11 22:55:00 | Charles Chara |
| Re:I agree - Charles C. | 08/09/11 23:13:00 | Nicola Howard |
| Re:Re:I agree - Charles C. | 09/09/11 00:07:00 | Rosco White |
| "Invalidity" of the Application | 09/09/11 02:10:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:"Invalidity" of the Application | 09/09/11 12:05:00 | Hasan Ukra |
| Re:Re:"Invalidity" of the Application | 09/09/11 13:13:00 | Ana Strachan |
| The last 4 months | 09/09/11 21:31:00 | Andrea Hondrou |
| Re:The last 4 months | 09/09/11 22:36:00 | Lesley Russell |
| Case Officer did not visit No.53 next door | 10/09/11 20:21:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:Case Officer did not visit No.53 next door | 10/09/11 21:57:00 | Hani Ukra |
| Viewing from neighbouring viewpoints | 11/09/11 11:53:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Viewing from neighbouring viewpoints (corrected) | 11/09/11 12:06:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:Viewing from neighbouring viewpoints (corrected) | 11/09/11 21:35:00 | joseph birotz |
| Forum typing. | 12/09/11 14:12:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Forum typing (correction) | 12/09/11 14:14:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Solicitors to be instructed. | 13/09/11 12:11:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:Solicitors to be instructed. | 13/09/11 13:58:00 | Dee Cook |
| Re:Solicitors to be instructed. | 13/09/11 18:51:00 | Hani Ukra |
| Re:Re:Solicitors to be instructed. | 13/09/11 23:53:00 | Rosco White |
| Planning Letter from 37 Gibbon Road 13/9/11. | 15/09/11 09:54:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| A new game | 16/09/11 19:12:00 | Hani Ukra |
| Interesting reading... | 19/09/11 20:57:00 | Pavlos Dora |
| Re:Interesting reading... | 19/09/11 21:40:00 | Iain Muir |
| Iain Muir... | 19/09/11 21:58:00 | Pavlos Dora |
| Re:Iain Muir... | 20/09/11 09:45:00 | Lesley Russell |
| Re:Re:Iain Muir... | 20/09/11 10:56:00 | joseph birotz |
| Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir... | 20/09/11 12:29:00 | Rosco White |
| Planning Facts | 20/09/11 15:46:00 | Elena Nutkins |
| Re:Planning Facts | 20/09/11 16:34:00 | joseph birotz |
| Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir... | 20/09/11 16:52:00 | Lesley Russell |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir... | 20/09/11 16:59:00 | joseph birotz |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir... | 20/09/11 17:07:00 | joseph birotz |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir... | 20/09/11 17:08:00 | Lesley Russell |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir... | 20/09/11 17:12:00 | joseph birotz |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir... | 20/09/11 20:13:00 | Rosco White |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir... | 20/09/11 22:17:00 | Iain Muir |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir... | 21/09/11 12:24:00 | Lesley Russell |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir... | 21/09/11 13:41:00 | joseph birotz |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir... | 21/09/11 13:55:00 | Rosco White |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir... | 21/09/11 15:08:00 | Nicola Howard |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir... | 21/09/11 15:15:00 | Lesley Russell |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir... | 21/09/11 15:10:00 | Lesley Russell |
| Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!! | 22/09/11 13:20:00 | Diana ONeill |
| Re:Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!! | 23/09/11 12:24:00 | Dee Cook |
| Re:Re:Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!! | 23/09/11 19:17:00 | Iain Muir |
| Solicitors letters sent to all three parties yesterday | 27/09/11 11:08:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Destruction of Trees in the Gardens of Nos. 53 & 55 | 30/09/11 10:47:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:Destruction of Trees in the Gardens of Nos. 53 & 55 | 30/09/11 11:09:00 | Ellie Rose |
| Re:Re:Destruction of Trees in the Gardens of Nos. 53 & 55 | 30/09/11 11:49:00 | joseph birotz |
| Re:Re:Re:Destruction of Trees in the Gardens of Nos. 53 & 55 | 30/09/11 11:55:00 | Ellie Rose |
| Re:Re:Re:Destruction of Trees in the Gardens of Nos. 53 & 55 | 30/09/11 12:00:00 | joseph birotz |
| Thank you, Ellie - Destruction of Trees in the Gardens of Nos. 53 & 55 | 03/10/11 12:51:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| COMPLAINT TO CHIEF EXECUTIVE, LBE. | 03/10/11 20:32:00 | Charles Chara |
| COMPLAINT TO DIRECTOR - ENVIRONMENT GROUP | 03/10/11 20:37:00 | Charles Chara |
| Re:COMPLAINT TO CHIEF EXECUTIVE, LBE. | 03/10/11 21:05:00 | Nicola Howard |
| WE DEMAND AN INVESTIGATION | 04/10/11 18:07:00 | Hasan Ukra |
| Re:WE DEMAND AN INVESTIGATION | 04/10/11 21:06:00 | Lesley Russell |
| Re:WE DEMAND AN INVESTIGATION | 05/10/11 14:54:00 | M ODonald |
| Re:WE DEMAND AN INVESTIGATION | 05/10/11 16:48:00 | Peter Millman |
| Inappropriate! | 05/10/11 18:21:00 | Andrea Hondrou |
| "Withdrawal" Notice arrives today. | 07/10/11 19:23:00 | Andrea Hondrou |
| Re:"Withdrawal" Notice arrives today. | 07/10/11 19:47:00 | Charles Chara |
| Re:Re:"Withdrawal" Notice arrives today. | 08/10/11 20:26:00 | Dee Cook |
| Re:Re:Re:"Withdrawal" Notice arrives today. | 08/10/11 20:32:00 | Lesley Russell |
| The use of the two dwellinghouses at Nos. 53 & 55 | 08/10/11 21:09:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:"Withdrawal" Notice arrives today. | 08/10/11 21:12:00 | Sarah Harris |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:"Withdrawal" Notice arrives today. | 08/10/11 21:43:00 | Lesley Russell |
| Cllr. Hitesh Tailor's letter of 4th October 2011 | 09/10/11 02:20:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!! | 09/10/11 23:33:00 | Laurie MacPherson |
| Withdrawn application but questions still unanswered... | 10/10/11 07:16:00 | Pavlos Dora |
| Re:Withdrawn application but questions still unanswered... | 10/10/11 20:59:00 | Lesley Russell |
| Ealing & Acton Gazette | 10/10/11 23:01:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| free paper | 11/10/11 00:35:00 | Pavlos Dora |
| Cllr Hitesh Tailor - response sought please. | 11/10/11 12:32:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:Cllr Hitesh Tailor - response sought please. | 11/10/11 14:01:00 | Nicola Howard |
| Cllr Hitesh Tailor - response sought please. | 12/10/11 01:26:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:Cllr Hitesh Tailor - response sought please (adjusted size) | 12/10/11 01:43:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Why are we being ignored? | 12/10/11 10:49:00 | Hasan Ukra |
| Re:Why are we being ignored? | 12/10/11 18:25:00 | Rosco White |
| "Lyndell House" | 13/10/11 00:52:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Second Complaint to Director dated 14/10/11. | 15/10/11 17:47:00 | Charles Chara |
| Re:Second Complaint to Director dated 14/10/11. | 21/10/11 11:05:00 | Charles Chara |
| Re:Re:Second Complaint to Director dated 14/10/11. | 22/10/11 08:44:00 | Hasan Ukra |
| Third Complaint to Ealing Council, Chief Executive dated 17/10/11 | 22/10/11 22:43:00 | Charles Chara |
| In bad faith! | 23/10/11 19:11:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:In bad faith! | 02/11/11 06:52:00 | Alan Fairchild |
| Re:Re:In bad faith! | 06/11/11 11:10:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:Re:Re:In bad faith! | 07/11/11 11:56:00 | Peter Millman |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:In bad faith! | 07/11/11 12:29:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Mr Noel Rutherford's response | 10/11/11 13:06:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:Mr Noel Rutherford's response | 10/11/11 21:17:00 | Lesley Russell |
| Re:Re:Mr Noel Rutherford's response | 11/11/11 02:47:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:Re:Re:Mr Noel Rutherford's response | 11/11/11 03:10:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:Mr Noel Rutherford's response | 11/11/11 19:54:00 | Joseph Birotz |
| Re:Re:Mr Noel Rutherford's response | 11/11/11 21:02:00 | Nicola Howard |
| Re:Re:Mr Noel Rutherford's response | 11/11/11 21:21:00 | Nicola Howard |
| Re:Re:Re:Mr Noel Rutherford's response | 12/11/11 07:58:00 | Joseph Birotz |
| The Covenant Movement | 13/11/11 02:56:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| The Covenant Movement (corrected) | 13/11/11 02:59:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| How it all started - My interest in covenants. | 13/11/11 10:54:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:How it all started - My interest in covenants. | 13/11/11 11:21:00 | Joseph Birotz |
| Thank you. | 14/11/11 02:30:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Rutherford | 16/11/11 12:11:00 | George Knox |
| Knox | 17/11/11 11:32:00 | Joseph Birotz |
| Re:Knox | 17/11/11 12:26:00 | George Knox |
| Re:Re:Knox | 17/11/11 13:45:00 | Joseph Birotz |
| Follow-Up Letter to Mr Noel Rutherford | 23/11/11 02:27:00 | Charles Chara |
| Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!! | 21/12/11 12:16:00 | Geoffrey Berg |
| Happy Xmas | 22/12/11 00:14:00 | Victor Mishiku |