An earlier member of the Forum wrote: "....we return from honeymoon to find our street will be taken over by all sorts of characters and that we are not being told the whole truth, all the dodgy planning application, signatures etc and the fact that whoever is pocketing money from this doesn't have to live next to them! We live about 10 doors away and do not want people who use drugs, are on drugs, were on on drugs, prostitutes,pimps, mental patients, paedophiles and the like on our doorstep. We chose to live in the area as it was a quiet, family orientated neighbourhood, with good local schools, a lovely clean park and people who on the whole respect their property and each other."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The "Annoyance" covenant, as imposed by deed of covenant by The Goldsmiths Company, is designed to relieve homeowners and occupiers from the anxiety and distress like those worries expressed above. Residents on the Estate do not have to "wait and see" how troublesome a particular development would be - they are entitled to insist that the terms of the covenant be observed, namely to have a private family dwellinghouse not a 24-Hours institutional ex-offenders, drug addicts and sex workers hostel next door to them.
This planning Application apparently being promoted by the planners, who unaccountably are disregarding the legal requirements on the validity of planning applications under 3 statutes [Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended), Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2010 - Statutory Instrument 2010 No.2184 and Government Guidance Guidance on Information Requirements and Validation, paragraphs 50 - 52], has resulted in over 1,000 objections to date (not 700 as stated by the planning officer in his report to Committee) both by letters individually sent in and by two petitions.
The Site Visit was attended by over 100 local residents - the largest attendance I have seen in the last 25 years, when we started "The Covenant Movement" to fight back against backland developers, who found favour with Ealing planners.
It seems that this application was supposed to be kept "secret" - the developers DiversityInCare (Ms Angela Edmondson) asked the Council NOT TO REVEAL the true intended use of the two covenanted private dwellinghouses.
It was only because of the suspicions of local families that eventually the truth started to emerge.
In her letter dated 1st August 2011 to a local family, Ms Aileen Jones, the Chief Planning Officer for Ealing Council wrote:
"I would confirm that the application, submitted by Diversity In Care Limited, was initially received on the 14th April 2011. The submitted application forms described the proposal as: 'Application for change of use. 2 properties converted into one residential unit. Internal alterations - through doorway, garden fence removed to make one garden. Front area - small section of wall removed to make throughway. Ramp added to front stairs to make access for pushchairs and/or disabled.' Further information about the proposed usage was provided by the applicants, but the applicants requested that this information not be made publicly available."
The Council's Planning Department went along with this and sent out a notification letter received by a handful of neighbours with no real information about what Ms Edmondson really has in mind for these two hitherto family dwellinghouses.
It is to be noted that this letter sent by Ms Jones on 1st August 2011 (3½ months after the application was made) was only as a result of complaints to The Mayor of London and The Chief Executive of Ealing Council.
In 1991, as reported by Mira Bar-Hillel of the Evening Standard then writing in the Chartered Surveyor magazine, the Council was found guilty of maladministration in respect of a proposed hostel (or "cluster flats" as euphemistically described by EFHA) for persons referred by the Home Office as ex-offenders on licence, etc in Freeland Road on the "Elms Estate Ealing & Acton". Over 60 neighbours complained to the Local Government Ombudsman that the Council had not revealed the true intended use of the dwellinghouse at No.18 Freeland Road as an ex-offenders Hostel.
I am therefore very surprised that Ealing planners went along with this request from Ms Angela Edmonson and it might be reasonably thought that this was a conspiracy to deprive the public of information that was going to be taken into account by the Council but withheld from the neighbours, who of course are entitled to be notified of the true intended usage.
I would have thought that any Decision made by the Council in reliance on information that was withheld and not made public at consultation would very likely be challengeable in the Adminstrative Court by way of Judicial Review.
However, it is regrettable that our own Council favours the Lambeth developers and was prepared to go against the Ombudsman's ruling against the interests and peace of mind of Acton residents of this Borough.
The developers claimed (and the Council accepted this without question) that on 28th March 2011 ABID HAMED (misspelt) was the sole owner of No.53 Friars Place Lane but examination of the Land Registry Register for NGL326387 on 10th August 2011 and again yesterday 3rd September 2011 shows that Mrs SADIA WAHID is the Registered Proprietor and has been since 8th October 2010.
As to this serious matter of the Ownership Certificate Notice submitted by the developers, DiversityInCare Limited (Ms Angela Edmondson) falsely claiming that as at 28th March 2011 ABID HAMED (misspelt) was the owner of No.53 Friars Place Lane, I have just received an e-mail from Ms Jones pointing out that even if the wrong parties are named in the application papers, it doesn't really matter since the development couldn't go ahead if the real owners were not agreeable (or words to this effect).
But this disappointing response from Ms Jones is simply no answer to the legal requirements for developers to submit correct and truthful information to the Council. It is a criminal offence to knowingly or recklessly submit a false Ownership Certificate. In my opinion, Ms Jones is setting a very poor example by her submissive and ineffective reply. I mean why bother with Certificates at all if the real owners can stop it or if there is a covenant to stop it? - this is what Ms Jones seems to be saying!
This is an open invitation to developers to abuse the law. I know of a case in L.B Brent where such abuse had very serious results, which I can explain later in another posting. I have asked that this application be taken off the Agenda in the absence of a proper Certificate and proper drawings. The drawings (as mentioned by another member of the Forum) are appalling. They do not show the internal layout for where the 19/20 occupiers + numerous day and night staff are going to be trained, receive treatment, work, live and sleep. The Applicant also refers to a new building the back garden for a Children's Nursery (10 children + staff). I do not recall seeing any plans/drawings and elevations of this new proposed backgarden building on the Web?
In any event, the planning officer, Mr Andrew Vaughan should NEVER have accepted such inadequate and unprofessional drawings. The plans are hopeless and unacceptable. Why then are the planners accepting them?
In a case at 14 Haven Green W5 that I have been familiar with since 1988, far superior plans (for the conversion of a derelict coach-house/garage) to those submitted by Ms Edmondson were instantly rejected by the Council's planners because of the omission of some detail and information as to the use of one small balcony area. The case officer in that instance (not Mr Andrew Vaughan) sent a whole long detailed list of requirements to the develoeprs before the Council would even consider the Application further. Nothing was ever received after the developers were put to the test and that was the end of their application!
FALSE OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATE/NOTICE: I distinctly recall a meeting of the West Area Planning Sub-Committee some years ago being conducted at the time of Cllr. Frank Impey, Labour Member for a Northolt Ward and Chair of the Planning Committee. The senior Planning Manager at that time (Ms Jones's former superior) told the Committee when a certain Southall application came up on the Agenda that information had been received that very afternoon from a local resident (Mr George Twyman of the Southall History Society) that the applicants EFHA were NOT in fact the owners of the proposed development land as they had claimed in their Application Form.
The Committee were duly advised by the Planning Manager that discussion of the case should not go ahead as the application was invalid because of the Ownership Certification defect. One Councillor asked the Legal Officer to investigate a prosecution. The application was then promptly removed from the Agenda for that night's meeting.
But contrast this with Ms Jones's bizarre attitude that any question over the statutory requirements and planning law on ownership certificates/notices doesn't really matter - well, at least it seems, as far as Ms Edmondson is concerned!
Victor Mishiku
"The Covenant Movement"
Sunday 4th September 2011.
|
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!! | 30/08/11 21:10:00 | Elena Enn |
| Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!! | 30/08/11 21:49:00 | Nicola Howard |
| Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!! | 30/08/11 21:50:00 | Elena Enn |
| Re:Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!! | 30/08/11 22:10:00 | Nicola Howard |
| Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!! | 30/08/11 22:15:00 | Jacqueline Davis |
| Re:Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!! | 31/08/11 08:28:00 | Nigel Williams |
| Re:Re:Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!! | 31/08/11 13:00:00 | Nicola Howard |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!! | 31/08/11 13:27:00 | Sarah Harris |
| Invalid Application - Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!! | 31/08/11 14:34:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:Invalid Application - Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!! | 31/08/11 15:07:00 | Sarah Harris |
| Re:Invalid Application - Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!! | 31/08/11 15:07:00 | Sarah Harris |
| Goldsmiths' Acton Estate - Acton Residents Unrepresented. | 01/09/11 10:45:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:Goldsmiths' Acton Estate - Acton Residents Unrepresented. | 01/09/11 14:22:00 | joseph birotz |
| Re:Re:Goldsmiths' Acton Estate - Acton Residents Unrepresented. | 01/09/11 15:02:00 | Sarah Harris |
| Re:Re:Re:Goldsmiths' Acton Estate - Acton Residents Unrepresented. | 01/09/11 15:55:00 | joseph birotz |
| Re:Re:Goldsmiths' Acton Estate - Acton Residents Unrepresented. | 01/09/11 17:24:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:Re:Re:Goldsmiths' Acton Estate - Acton Residents Unrepresented. | 02/02/12 21:05:00 | kathy kennelly |
| SITE VISIT - Invalidity of the Application - | 02/09/11 18:45:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!! | 01/09/11 20:48:00 | Charles Chara |
| SITE VISIT Tomorrow Morning 9.10am 3rd September | 02/09/11 18:47:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:SITE VISIT Tomorrow Morning 9.10am 3rd September | 03/09/11 13:35:00 | Hasan Ukra |
| Re: SITE VISIT - 3rd September | 03/09/11 15:45:00 | Pavlos Dora |
| Re:Re: SITE VISIT - 3rd September | 03/09/11 17:22:00 | Lesley Russell |
| Re:Re:Re: SITE VISIT - 3rd September | 03/09/11 18:22:00 | Nicola Howard |
| Re:Re:Re:Re: SITE VISIT - 3rd September | 03/09/11 22:51:00 | Brijesh Chauhan |
| Post Site Visit comment | 04/09/11 12:03:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Post Site Visit comment (corrected) | 04/09/11 12:09:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Weblink E-Mail 4/9/11. | 04/09/11 14:42:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:Post Site Visit comment | 04/09/11 16:24:00 | Louisa Asker |
| Re:Re: SITE VISIT - 3rd September | 05/09/11 10:32:00 | Hasan Ukra |
| Re:Re:SITE VISIT Tomorrow Morning 9.10am 3rd September | 05/09/11 09:45:00 | Deborah Patellaro |
| 1,100 Objections lodged at the Council! | 04/09/11 21:53:00 | Charles Chara |
| Peaceful Acton neighbourhood | 04/09/11 22:09:00 | Charles Chara |
| Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!! | 05/09/11 16:46:00 | The Editor |
| MEETINGS - still on. | 05/09/11 20:14:00 | Elena Nutkins |
| Withdrawn Application - What a surprise! | 06/09/11 09:38:00 | Elena Nutkins |
| Re:Withdrawn Application - What a surprise! | 06/09/11 10:12:00 | Sara Nathan |
| Re:Re:Withdrawn Application - What a surprise! | 06/09/11 10:29:00 | Hasan Ukra |
| Re:Re:Re:Withdrawn Application - What a surprise! | 06/09/11 11:43:00 | Dee Cook |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Withdrawn Application - What a surprise! | 06/09/11 12:53:00 | Elena Nutkins |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Withdrawn Application - What a surprise! | 06/09/11 16:20:00 | Hasan Ukra |
| The Covenant | 06/09/11 16:01:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:The Covenant | 06/09/11 16:25:00 | Dee Cook |
| The Covenant | 06/09/11 19:02:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| planning committee, ref;53=55 FPL | 06/09/11 22:48:00 | Hani Ukra |
| Planning Department overruled by Legal Services | 07/09/11 00:12:00 | Charles Chara |
| Re:planning committee, ref;53=55 FPL | 07/09/11 08:35:00 | Elena Nutkins |
| Re:Re:planning committee, ref;53=55 FPL | 07/09/11 11:14:00 | Hasan Ukra |
| Re:Re:Re:planning committee, ref;53=55 FPL | 07/09/11 16:02:00 | M ODonald |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:planning committee, ref;53=55 FPL | 07/09/11 18:56:00 | Nicola Howard |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:planning committee, ref;53=55 FPL | 07/09/11 22:54:00 | Iain Muir |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:planning committee, ref;53=55 FPL | 08/09/11 13:37:00 | geoffrey berg |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:planning committee, ref;53=55 FPL | 08/09/11 14:40:00 | Nicola Howard |
| Residents' efforts rewarded | 08/09/11 17:04:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Correction :Residents' efforts rewarded | 08/09/11 17:05:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:planning committee, ref;53=55 FPL | 08/09/11 20:30:00 | Lesley Russell |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:planning committee, ref;53=55 FPL | 08/09/11 21:38:00 | Nicola Howard |
| False Certificate - Ownership Details, etc | 08/09/11 22:52:00 | Charles Chara |
| I agree - Charles C. | 08/09/11 22:55:00 | Charles Chara |
| Re:I agree - Charles C. | 08/09/11 23:13:00 | Nicola Howard |
| Re:Re:I agree - Charles C. | 09/09/11 00:07:00 | Rosco White |
| "Invalidity" of the Application | 09/09/11 02:10:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:"Invalidity" of the Application | 09/09/11 12:05:00 | Hasan Ukra |
| Re:Re:"Invalidity" of the Application | 09/09/11 13:13:00 | Ana Strachan |
| The last 4 months | 09/09/11 21:31:00 | Andrea Hondrou |
| Re:The last 4 months | 09/09/11 22:36:00 | Lesley Russell |
| Case Officer did not visit No.53 next door | 10/09/11 20:21:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:Case Officer did not visit No.53 next door | 10/09/11 21:57:00 | Hani Ukra |
| Viewing from neighbouring viewpoints | 11/09/11 11:53:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Viewing from neighbouring viewpoints (corrected) | 11/09/11 12:06:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:Viewing from neighbouring viewpoints (corrected) | 11/09/11 21:35:00 | joseph birotz |
| Forum typing. | 12/09/11 14:12:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Forum typing (correction) | 12/09/11 14:14:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Solicitors to be instructed. | 13/09/11 12:11:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:Solicitors to be instructed. | 13/09/11 13:58:00 | Dee Cook |
| Re:Solicitors to be instructed. | 13/09/11 18:51:00 | Hani Ukra |
| Re:Re:Solicitors to be instructed. | 13/09/11 23:53:00 | Rosco White |
| Planning Letter from 37 Gibbon Road 13/9/11. | 15/09/11 09:54:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| A new game | 16/09/11 19:12:00 | Hani Ukra |
| Interesting reading... | 19/09/11 20:57:00 | Pavlos Dora |
| Re:Interesting reading... | 19/09/11 21:40:00 | Iain Muir |
| Iain Muir... | 19/09/11 21:58:00 | Pavlos Dora |
| Re:Iain Muir... | 20/09/11 09:45:00 | Lesley Russell |
| Re:Re:Iain Muir... | 20/09/11 10:56:00 | joseph birotz |
| Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir... | 20/09/11 12:29:00 | Rosco White |
| Planning Facts | 20/09/11 15:46:00 | Elena Nutkins |
| Re:Planning Facts | 20/09/11 16:34:00 | joseph birotz |
| Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir... | 20/09/11 16:52:00 | Lesley Russell |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir... | 20/09/11 16:59:00 | joseph birotz |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir... | 20/09/11 17:07:00 | joseph birotz |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir... | 20/09/11 17:08:00 | Lesley Russell |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir... | 20/09/11 17:12:00 | joseph birotz |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir... | 20/09/11 20:13:00 | Rosco White |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir... | 20/09/11 22:17:00 | Iain Muir |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir... | 21/09/11 12:24:00 | Lesley Russell |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir... | 21/09/11 13:41:00 | joseph birotz |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir... | 21/09/11 13:55:00 | Rosco White |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir... | 21/09/11 15:08:00 | Nicola Howard |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir... | 21/09/11 15:15:00 | Lesley Russell |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir... | 21/09/11 15:10:00 | Lesley Russell |
| Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!! | 22/09/11 13:20:00 | Diana ONeill |
| Re:Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!! | 23/09/11 12:24:00 | Dee Cook |
| Re:Re:Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!! | 23/09/11 19:17:00 | Iain Muir |
| Solicitors letters sent to all three parties yesterday | 27/09/11 11:08:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Destruction of Trees in the Gardens of Nos. 53 & 55 | 30/09/11 10:47:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:Destruction of Trees in the Gardens of Nos. 53 & 55 | 30/09/11 11:09:00 | Ellie Rose |
| Re:Re:Destruction of Trees in the Gardens of Nos. 53 & 55 | 30/09/11 11:49:00 | joseph birotz |
| Re:Re:Re:Destruction of Trees in the Gardens of Nos. 53 & 55 | 30/09/11 11:55:00 | Ellie Rose |
| Re:Re:Re:Destruction of Trees in the Gardens of Nos. 53 & 55 | 30/09/11 12:00:00 | joseph birotz |
| Thank you, Ellie - Destruction of Trees in the Gardens of Nos. 53 & 55 | 03/10/11 12:51:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| COMPLAINT TO CHIEF EXECUTIVE, LBE. | 03/10/11 20:32:00 | Charles Chara |
| COMPLAINT TO DIRECTOR - ENVIRONMENT GROUP | 03/10/11 20:37:00 | Charles Chara |
| Re:COMPLAINT TO CHIEF EXECUTIVE, LBE. | 03/10/11 21:05:00 | Nicola Howard |
| WE DEMAND AN INVESTIGATION | 04/10/11 18:07:00 | Hasan Ukra |
| Re:WE DEMAND AN INVESTIGATION | 04/10/11 21:06:00 | Lesley Russell |
| Re:WE DEMAND AN INVESTIGATION | 05/10/11 14:54:00 | M ODonald |
| Re:WE DEMAND AN INVESTIGATION | 05/10/11 16:48:00 | Peter Millman |
| Inappropriate! | 05/10/11 18:21:00 | Andrea Hondrou |
| "Withdrawal" Notice arrives today. | 07/10/11 19:23:00 | Andrea Hondrou |
| Re:"Withdrawal" Notice arrives today. | 07/10/11 19:47:00 | Charles Chara |
| Re:Re:"Withdrawal" Notice arrives today. | 08/10/11 20:26:00 | Dee Cook |
| Re:Re:Re:"Withdrawal" Notice arrives today. | 08/10/11 20:32:00 | Lesley Russell |
| The use of the two dwellinghouses at Nos. 53 & 55 | 08/10/11 21:09:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:"Withdrawal" Notice arrives today. | 08/10/11 21:12:00 | Sarah Harris |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:"Withdrawal" Notice arrives today. | 08/10/11 21:43:00 | Lesley Russell |
| Cllr. Hitesh Tailor's letter of 4th October 2011 | 09/10/11 02:20:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!! | 09/10/11 23:33:00 | Laurie MacPherson |
| Withdrawn application but questions still unanswered... | 10/10/11 07:16:00 | Pavlos Dora |
| Re:Withdrawn application but questions still unanswered... | 10/10/11 20:59:00 | Lesley Russell |
| Ealing & Acton Gazette | 10/10/11 23:01:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| free paper | 11/10/11 00:35:00 | Pavlos Dora |
| Cllr Hitesh Tailor - response sought please. | 11/10/11 12:32:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:Cllr Hitesh Tailor - response sought please. | 11/10/11 14:01:00 | Nicola Howard |
| Cllr Hitesh Tailor - response sought please. | 12/10/11 01:26:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:Cllr Hitesh Tailor - response sought please (adjusted size) | 12/10/11 01:43:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Why are we being ignored? | 12/10/11 10:49:00 | Hasan Ukra |
| Re:Why are we being ignored? | 12/10/11 18:25:00 | Rosco White |
| "Lyndell House" | 13/10/11 00:52:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Second Complaint to Director dated 14/10/11. | 15/10/11 17:47:00 | Charles Chara |
| Re:Second Complaint to Director dated 14/10/11. | 21/10/11 11:05:00 | Charles Chara |
| Re:Re:Second Complaint to Director dated 14/10/11. | 22/10/11 08:44:00 | Hasan Ukra |
| Third Complaint to Ealing Council, Chief Executive dated 17/10/11 | 22/10/11 22:43:00 | Charles Chara |
| In bad faith! | 23/10/11 19:11:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:In bad faith! | 02/11/11 06:52:00 | Alan Fairchild |
| Re:Re:In bad faith! | 06/11/11 11:10:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:Re:Re:In bad faith! | 07/11/11 11:56:00 | Peter Millman |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:In bad faith! | 07/11/11 12:29:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Mr Noel Rutherford's response | 10/11/11 13:06:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:Mr Noel Rutherford's response | 10/11/11 21:17:00 | Lesley Russell |
| Re:Re:Mr Noel Rutherford's response | 11/11/11 02:47:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:Re:Re:Mr Noel Rutherford's response | 11/11/11 03:10:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:Mr Noel Rutherford's response | 11/11/11 19:54:00 | Joseph Birotz |
| Re:Re:Mr Noel Rutherford's response | 11/11/11 21:02:00 | Nicola Howard |
| Re:Re:Mr Noel Rutherford's response | 11/11/11 21:21:00 | Nicola Howard |
| Re:Re:Re:Mr Noel Rutherford's response | 12/11/11 07:58:00 | Joseph Birotz |
| The Covenant Movement | 13/11/11 02:56:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| The Covenant Movement (corrected) | 13/11/11 02:59:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| How it all started - My interest in covenants. | 13/11/11 10:54:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Re:How it all started - My interest in covenants. | 13/11/11 11:21:00 | Joseph Birotz |
| Thank you. | 14/11/11 02:30:00 | Victor Mishiku |
| Rutherford | 16/11/11 12:11:00 | George Knox |
| Knox | 17/11/11 11:32:00 | Joseph Birotz |
| Re:Knox | 17/11/11 12:26:00 | George Knox |
| Re:Re:Knox | 17/11/11 13:45:00 | Joseph Birotz |
| Follow-Up Letter to Mr Noel Rutherford | 23/11/11 02:27:00 | Charles Chara |
| Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!! | 21/12/11 12:16:00 | Geoffrey Berg |
| Happy Xmas | 22/12/11 00:14:00 | Victor Mishiku |