Bearing in mind the ample inconsistencies and gross irregularities that have been identified and supplied to Ealing Council over the last few weeks, we are astounded that this application was even been given the time of day. What a surprise it was withdrawn -NOT! The planning department who claim to be experts could not even see the application was invalid or perhaps they chose not to see it as invalid??? The proposal is full of false information and is a badly thought out service with no consideration to the well being of it’s occupants or neighbours who will suffer in the interests of financial gain. The case officers recommendations mean absolutely nothing, they are biased and the support of this application by other Council Departments and Councillors is totally unjustified. From day one they have all been pushing to get this application granted and I can only ask myself why when it is so wrong from the point of view of planning grounds and other valid objections – what’s in it for the planners I wonder??? (We know what's in it for the developers!) Even now that it has been withdrawn from the Committee meeting the Planners will be advising the developer on how to rectify their mistakes and make the application valid. Is this the behaviour of so called ‘professional’ people that are meant to give an objective and sound point of view.  Since the application should not have even been entertained and certainly withdrawn because it was illegal why do they continue to support this downright offensive application?. Residents have spent a great deal of time and money on objecting to this application when it was invalid and now the Planning Department want to advise the applicant how to improve her application. I despair at the corruption taking place. Well done Ealing Council for being so obvious! Not one single Council official has put themselves in the position of residents, if it was happening directly next door to their homes they would Object without hesitation yet in this case they are washing their hands because it is someone else’s problems and possibly a personal benefit – this is absolutely immoral and disgusting behaviour and they should hang their heads in shame! Our Councillors blatantly knew about this application because we saw the internal memo way before residents had any idea about the application yet they acted dishonestly by pretending to know nothing about it rather than just coming clean! It strikes me that it is funny how if someone wants to build a small extension or change their windows the Planning Department jump on their backs wanting detailed plans and ensuring building regulations are in place at great expense to the applicant yet for some reason when a planning application such as this one involves people LIVES they are happy to turn a blind eye to the poor plans and disastrous proposal.... No-one has even considered the stress on residents and their families, the sleepless nights working all hours. Residents have acted more professionally and presented a far more valid case than the amateur,  dangerous and invalid proposal put forward by the applicant. It made me laugh because I wonder if the developers would be so happy working with the manager of the properties if they knew what he was really like. His reference to residents as ‘villagers’ when he was showing the Planning Committee round the properties was comical particularly coming from a man who has been heard being openly racist and who is apparently so good at ‘managing’ the properties on behalf of the owners that he allowed them to operate as a cannabis factory, apparently without his knowledge. I expect he is also getting paid a commission from both the owners of the properties and the developers on the back of this deal so he will be profiting if the change of use is granted. Whilst the residents may be ‘villagers’ for caring about the well being and safety of their community, area and homes by objecting to this application I can only conclude that the manager is a greedy crook! We look forward to seeing residents on Tuesday 6th September at St. Dunstans Church at 7-7.30pm.

Entire Thread

Topic	Date Posted	Posted By
Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!!	30/08/11 21:10:00	Elena Enn
Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!!	30/08/11 21:49:00	Nicola Howard
Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!!	30/08/11 21:50:00	Elena Enn
Re:Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!!	30/08/11 22:10:00	Nicola Howard
Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!!	30/08/11 22:15:00	Jacqueline Davis
Re:Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!!	31/08/11 08:28:00	Nigel Williams
Re:Re:Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!!	31/08/11 13:00:00	Nicola Howard
Re:Re:Re:Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!!	31/08/11 13:27:00	Sarah Harris
Invalid Application - Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!!	31/08/11 14:34:00	Victor Mishiku
Re:Invalid Application - Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!!	31/08/11 15:07:00	Sarah Harris
Re:Invalid Application - Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!!	31/08/11 15:07:00	Sarah Harris
Goldsmiths' Acton Estate - Acton Residents Unrepresented.	01/09/11 10:45:00	Victor Mishiku
Re:Goldsmiths' Acton Estate - Acton Residents Unrepresented.	01/09/11 14:22:00	joseph birotz
Re:Re:Goldsmiths' Acton Estate - Acton Residents Unrepresented.	01/09/11 15:02:00	Sarah Harris
Re:Re:Re:Goldsmiths' Acton Estate - Acton Residents Unrepresented.	01/09/11 15:55:00	joseph birotz
Re:Re:Goldsmiths' Acton Estate - Acton Residents Unrepresented.	01/09/11 17:24:00	Victor Mishiku
Re:Re:Re:Goldsmiths' Acton Estate - Acton Residents Unrepresented.	02/02/12 21:05:00	kathy kennelly
SITE VISIT - Invalidity of the Application -	02/09/11 18:45:00	Victor Mishiku
Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!!	01/09/11 20:48:00	Charles Chara
SITE VISIT  Tomorrow Morning 9.10am 3rd September	02/09/11 18:47:00	Victor Mishiku
Re:SITE VISIT  Tomorrow Morning 9.10am 3rd September	03/09/11 13:35:00	Hasan Ukra
Re: SITE VISIT  - 3rd September	03/09/11 15:45:00	Pavlos Dora
Re:Re: SITE VISIT  - 3rd September	03/09/11 17:22:00	Lesley Russell
Re:Re:Re: SITE VISIT  - 3rd September	03/09/11 18:22:00	Nicola Howard
Re:Re:Re:Re: SITE VISIT  - 3rd September	03/09/11 22:51:00	Brijesh Chauhan
Post Site Visit comment	04/09/11 12:03:00	Victor Mishiku
Post Site Visit comment (corrected)	04/09/11 12:09:00	Victor Mishiku
Weblink E-Mail 4/9/11.	04/09/11 14:42:00	Victor Mishiku
Re:Post Site Visit comment	04/09/11 16:24:00	Louisa Asker
Re:Re: SITE VISIT  - 3rd September	05/09/11 10:32:00	Hasan Ukra
Re:Re:SITE VISIT  Tomorrow Morning 9.10am 3rd September	05/09/11 09:45:00	Deborah Patellaro
1,100 Objections lodged at the Council!	04/09/11 21:53:00	Charles Chara
Peaceful Acton neighbourhood	04/09/11 22:09:00	Charles Chara
Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!!	05/09/11 16:46:00	The Editor
MEETINGS - still on.	05/09/11 20:14:00	Elena Nutkins
Withdrawn Application - What a surprise!	06/09/11 09:38:00	Elena Nutkins
Re:Withdrawn Application - What a surprise!	06/09/11 10:12:00	Sara Nathan
Re:Re:Withdrawn Application - What a surprise!	06/09/11 10:29:00	Hasan Ukra
Re:Re:Re:Withdrawn Application - What a surprise!	06/09/11 11:43:00	Dee Cook
Re:Re:Re:Re:Withdrawn Application - What a surprise!	06/09/11 12:53:00	Elena Nutkins
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Withdrawn Application - What a surprise!	06/09/11 16:20:00	Hasan Ukra
The Covenant	06/09/11 16:01:00	Victor Mishiku
Re:The Covenant	06/09/11 16:25:00	Dee Cook
The Covenant	06/09/11 19:02:00	Victor Mishiku
planning committee, ref;53=55 FPL	06/09/11 22:48:00	Hani Ukra
Planning Department overruled by Legal Services	07/09/11 00:12:00	Charles Chara
Re:planning committee, ref;53=55 FPL	07/09/11 08:35:00	Elena Nutkins
Re:Re:planning committee, ref;53=55 FPL	07/09/11 11:14:00	Hasan Ukra
Re:Re:Re:planning committee, ref;53=55 FPL	07/09/11 16:02:00	M ODonald
Re:Re:Re:Re:planning committee, ref;53=55 FPL	07/09/11 18:56:00	Nicola Howard
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:planning committee, ref;53=55 FPL	07/09/11 22:54:00	Iain Muir
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:planning committee, ref;53=55 FPL	08/09/11 13:37:00	geoffrey berg
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:planning committee, ref;53=55 FPL	08/09/11 14:40:00	Nicola Howard
Residents' efforts rewarded	08/09/11 17:04:00	Victor Mishiku
Correction :Residents' efforts rewarded	08/09/11 17:05:00	Victor Mishiku
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:planning committee, ref;53=55 FPL	08/09/11 20:30:00	Lesley Russell
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:planning committee, ref;53=55 FPL	08/09/11 21:38:00	Nicola Howard
False Certificate - Ownership Details, etc	08/09/11 22:52:00	Charles Chara
I agree - Charles C.	08/09/11 22:55:00	Charles Chara
Re:I agree - Charles C.	08/09/11 23:13:00	Nicola Howard
Re:Re:I agree - Charles C.	09/09/11 00:07:00	Rosco White
"Invalidity" of the Application	09/09/11 02:10:00	Victor Mishiku
Re:"Invalidity" of the Application	09/09/11 12:05:00	Hasan Ukra
Re:Re:"Invalidity" of the Application	09/09/11 13:13:00	Ana Strachan
The last 4 months	09/09/11 21:31:00	Andrea Hondrou
Re:The last 4 months	09/09/11 22:36:00	Lesley Russell
Case Officer did not visit No.53 next door	10/09/11 20:21:00	Victor Mishiku
Re:Case Officer did not visit No.53 next door	10/09/11 21:57:00	Hani Ukra
Viewing from neighbouring viewpoints	11/09/11 11:53:00	Victor Mishiku
Viewing from neighbouring viewpoints (corrected)	11/09/11 12:06:00	Victor Mishiku
Re:Viewing from neighbouring viewpoints (corrected)	11/09/11 21:35:00	joseph birotz
Forum typing.	12/09/11 14:12:00	Victor Mishiku
Forum typing (correction)	12/09/11 14:14:00	Victor Mishiku
Solicitors to be instructed.	13/09/11 12:11:00	Victor Mishiku
Re:Solicitors to be instructed.	13/09/11 13:58:00	Dee Cook
Re:Solicitors to be instructed.	13/09/11 18:51:00	Hani Ukra
Re:Re:Solicitors to be instructed.	13/09/11 23:53:00	Rosco White
Planning Letter from 37 Gibbon Road 13/9/11.	15/09/11 09:54:00	Victor Mishiku
A new game	16/09/11 19:12:00	Hani Ukra
Interesting reading...	19/09/11 20:57:00	Pavlos Dora
Re:Interesting reading...	19/09/11 21:40:00	Iain Muir
Iain Muir...	19/09/11 21:58:00	Pavlos Dora
Re:Iain Muir...	20/09/11 09:45:00	Lesley Russell
Re:Re:Iain Muir...	20/09/11 10:56:00	joseph birotz
Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir...	20/09/11 12:29:00	Rosco White
Planning Facts	20/09/11 15:46:00	Elena Nutkins
Re:Planning Facts	20/09/11 16:34:00	joseph birotz
Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir...	20/09/11 16:52:00	Lesley Russell
Re:Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir...	20/09/11 16:59:00	joseph birotz
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir...	20/09/11 17:07:00	joseph birotz
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir...	20/09/11 17:08:00	Lesley Russell
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir...	20/09/11 17:12:00	joseph birotz
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir...	20/09/11 20:13:00	Rosco White
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir...	20/09/11 22:17:00	Iain Muir
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir...	21/09/11 12:24:00	Lesley Russell
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir...	21/09/11 13:41:00	joseph birotz
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir...	21/09/11 13:55:00	Rosco White
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir...	21/09/11 15:08:00	Nicola Howard
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir...	21/09/11 15:15:00	Lesley Russell
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Iain Muir...	21/09/11 15:10:00	Lesley Russell
Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!!	22/09/11 13:20:00	Diana ONeill
Re:Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!!	23/09/11 12:24:00	Dee Cook
Re:Re:Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!!	23/09/11 19:17:00	Iain Muir
Solicitors letters sent to all three parties yesterday	27/09/11 11:08:00	Victor Mishiku
Destruction of Trees in the Gardens of Nos. 53 & 55	30/09/11 10:47:00	Victor Mishiku
Re:Destruction of Trees in the Gardens of Nos. 53 & 55	30/09/11 11:09:00	Ellie Rose
Re:Re:Destruction of Trees in the Gardens of Nos. 53 & 55	30/09/11 11:49:00	joseph birotz
Re:Re:Re:Destruction of Trees in the Gardens of Nos. 53 & 55	30/09/11 11:55:00	Ellie Rose
Re:Re:Re:Destruction of Trees in the Gardens of Nos. 53 & 55	30/09/11 12:00:00	joseph birotz
Thank you, Ellie - Destruction of Trees in the Gardens of Nos. 53 & 55	03/10/11 12:51:00	Victor Mishiku
COMPLAINT TO CHIEF EXECUTIVE, LBE.	03/10/11 20:32:00	Charles Chara
COMPLAINT TO DIRECTOR - ENVIRONMENT GROUP	03/10/11 20:37:00	Charles Chara
Re:COMPLAINT TO CHIEF EXECUTIVE, LBE.	03/10/11 21:05:00	Nicola Howard
WE DEMAND AN INVESTIGATION	04/10/11 18:07:00	Hasan Ukra
Re:WE DEMAND AN INVESTIGATION	04/10/11 21:06:00	Lesley Russell
Re:WE DEMAND AN INVESTIGATION	05/10/11 14:54:00	M ODonald
Re:WE DEMAND AN INVESTIGATION	05/10/11 16:48:00	Peter Millman
Inappropriate!	05/10/11 18:21:00	Andrea Hondrou
"Withdrawal" Notice arrives today.	07/10/11 19:23:00	Andrea Hondrou
Re:"Withdrawal" Notice arrives today.	07/10/11 19:47:00	Charles Chara
Re:Re:"Withdrawal" Notice arrives today.	08/10/11 20:26:00	Dee Cook
Re:Re:Re:"Withdrawal" Notice arrives today.	08/10/11 20:32:00	Lesley Russell
The use of the two dwellinghouses at Nos. 53 & 55	08/10/11 21:09:00	Victor Mishiku
Re:Re:Re:Re:"Withdrawal" Notice arrives today.	08/10/11 21:12:00	Sarah Harris
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:"Withdrawal" Notice arrives today.	08/10/11 21:43:00	Lesley Russell
Cllr. Hitesh Tailor's letter of 4th October 2011	09/10/11 02:20:00	Victor Mishiku
Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!!	09/10/11 23:33:00	Laurie MacPherson
Withdrawn application but questions still unanswered...	10/10/11 07:16:00	Pavlos Dora
Re:Withdrawn application but questions still unanswered...	10/10/11 20:59:00	Lesley Russell
Ealing & Acton Gazette	10/10/11 23:01:00	Victor Mishiku
free paper	11/10/11 00:35:00	Pavlos Dora
Cllr Hitesh Tailor - response sought please.	11/10/11 12:32:00	Victor Mishiku
Re:Cllr Hitesh Tailor - response sought please.	11/10/11 14:01:00	Nicola Howard
Cllr Hitesh Tailor - response sought please.	12/10/11 01:26:00	Victor Mishiku
Re:Cllr Hitesh Tailor - response sought please (adjusted size)	12/10/11 01:43:00	Victor Mishiku
Why are we being ignored?	12/10/11 10:49:00	Hasan Ukra
Re:Why are we being ignored?	12/10/11 18:25:00	Rosco White
"Lyndell House"	13/10/11 00:52:00	Victor Mishiku
Second Complaint to Director dated 14/10/11.	15/10/11 17:47:00	Charles Chara
Re:Second Complaint to Director dated 14/10/11.	21/10/11 11:05:00	Charles Chara
Re:Re:Second Complaint to Director dated 14/10/11.	22/10/11 08:44:00	Hasan Ukra
Third Complaint to Ealing Council, Chief Executive dated 17/10/11	22/10/11 22:43:00	Charles Chara
In bad faith!	23/10/11 19:11:00	Victor Mishiku
Re:In bad faith!	02/11/11 06:52:00	Alan Fairchild
Re:Re:In bad faith!	06/11/11 11:10:00	Victor Mishiku
Re:Re:Re:In bad faith!	07/11/11 11:56:00	Peter Millman
Re:Re:Re:Re:In bad faith!	07/11/11 12:29:00	Victor Mishiku
Mr Noel Rutherford's response	10/11/11 13:06:00	Victor Mishiku
Re:Mr Noel Rutherford's response	10/11/11 21:17:00	Lesley Russell
Re:Re:Mr Noel Rutherford's response	11/11/11 02:47:00	Victor Mishiku
Re:Re:Re:Mr Noel Rutherford's response	11/11/11 03:10:00	Victor Mishiku
Re:Mr Noel Rutherford's response	11/11/11 19:54:00	Joseph Birotz
Re:Re:Mr Noel Rutherford's response	11/11/11 21:02:00	Nicola Howard
Re:Re:Mr Noel Rutherford's response	11/11/11 21:21:00	Nicola Howard
Re:Re:Re:Mr Noel Rutherford's response	12/11/11 07:58:00	Joseph Birotz
The Covenant Movement	13/11/11 02:56:00	Victor Mishiku
The Covenant Movement (corrected)	13/11/11 02:59:00	Victor Mishiku
How it all started - My interest in covenants.	13/11/11 10:54:00	Victor Mishiku
Re:How it all started - My interest in covenants.	13/11/11 11:21:00	Joseph Birotz
Thank you.	14/11/11 02:30:00	Victor Mishiku
Rutherford	16/11/11 12:11:00	George Knox
Knox	17/11/11 11:32:00	Joseph Birotz
Re:Knox	17/11/11 12:26:00	George Knox
Re:Re:Knox	17/11/11 13:45:00	Joseph Birotz
Follow-Up Letter to Mr Noel Rutherford	23/11/11 02:27:00	Charles Chara
Re:Acton Residents Unrepresented Again!!	21/12/11 12:16:00	Geoffrey Berg
Happy Xmas	22/12/11 00:14:00	Victor Mishiku

Forum Home