Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Oaks
Posted by: Richard Grange
Date/Time: 21/05/14 15:45:00

Hi Robert,

Thank you for categorically proving my point.

As I said - the Labour argument seems to be - "You are totally stuffed over the Oaks decision, so you might as well vote Labour again"

Er .....

Moreover, why, should voters trust Labour to "make sure the second phase of the project is more satisfactory than the first"?, given what it did over the Oaks.

I am not personally that interested in different party ideologies. But like most people, I do care when political parties appear to thumb their nose in the face of the people they claim to represent.

Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
Oaks28/04/14 13:41:00 Jane Willingale
   The Oaks: Labour Determined to sell out Acton28/04/14 14:19:00 Phil Taylor
   Re:Oaks28/04/14 14:39:00 Anne Brown
      Re:Re:Oaks28/04/14 15:05:00 John Kennedy
      Re:Re:Oaks28/04/14 19:10:00 Phil Taylor
         Re:Re:Re:Oaks29/04/14 00:04:00 Jean F Fernandez
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Oaks29/04/14 10:07:00 Richard Grange
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Oaks29/04/14 15:10:00 Maire Lowe
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Oaks30/04/14 00:02:00 Rosco White
   Re:Oaks21/05/14 12:50:00 Paul Webster
      Re:Re:Oaks21/05/14 13:14:00 Phil Taylor
         Re:Re:Re:Oaks21/05/14 13:15:00 Paul Webster
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Oaks21/05/14 13:18:00 Paul Webster
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Oaks21/05/14 14:01:00 Richard Grange
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Oaks21/05/14 14:24:00 Robert John Anderson
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Oaks21/05/14 15:45:00 Richard Grange
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Oaks21/05/14 16:00:00 Maire Lowe
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Oaks21/05/14 16:02:00 Robert John Anderson
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Oaks21/05/14 16:17:00 Richard Grange

Forum Home