| Topic: | Re:COUNCIL BUNG AND THE LOST 64 JOBS | |
| Posted by: | Helen Coleman | |
| Date/Time: | 04/12/09 10:46:00 |
| Well yes on the face of it, it doesn't make much sense, but it does if you look a bit further. This is money available this year that they can't carry over (because they didn't have to pay central govt £4.6m in the end). The job cuts will come next year when they have to balance the books in year. So the fact they've got extra money this year, doesn't mean they've got enough money next year. |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| COUNCIL BUNG AND THE LOST 64 JOBS | 04/12/09 09:48:00 | Richard Grange |
| Re:COUNCIL BUNG AND THE LOST 64 JOBS | 04/12/09 10:14:00 | Chris Hurley |
| Re:Re:COUNCIL BUNG AND THE LOST 64 JOBS | 04/12/09 10:26:00 | Richard Grange |
| Re:Re:Re:COUNCIL BUNG AND THE LOST 64 JOBS | 04/12/09 10:28:00 | Dee Cook |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:COUNCIL BUNG AND THE LOST 64 JOBS | 04/12/09 10:34:00 | Richard Grange |
| Re:Re:COUNCIL BUNG AND THE LOST 64 JOBS | 04/12/09 10:33:00 | Richard Grange |
| Re:Re:COUNCIL BUNG AND THE LOST 64 JOBS | 04/12/09 23:04:00 | Mavis Walker |
| Re:COUNCIL BUNG AND THE LOST 64 JOBS | 04/12/09 10:46:00 | Helen Coleman |
| Re:Re:COUNCIL BUNG AND THE LOST 64 JOBS | 04/12/09 13:13:00 | Libby Kemp |
| Re:Re:Re:COUNCIL BUNG AND THE LOST 64 JOBS | 04/12/09 13:47:00 | Helen Coleman |
| COUNCIL BUNG AND THE LOST 64 JOBS | 04/12/09 14:37:00 | George Knox |