| Topic: | Re:Re:Ealing Council ‘well-led’ according to expert review 😁 | |
| Posted by: | Alan Fairchild | |
| Date/Time: | 04/09/25 08:48:00 |
| There is a more balanced account of this report on the front page and not from the council's propaganda magazine. While the positives are managed, there are also quite a number of concerns being raised. What would be helpful would be some context. Do these LGC peer reviews inevitably soft soap their conclusions and everyone gets a pat on the back or do the deficiencies of underperforming councils get the spotlight put on them? |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| Ealing Council ‘well-led’ according to expert review 😁 | 28/08/25 18:36:00 | Rosco White |
| Re:Ealing Council ‘well-led’ according to expert review 😁 | 29/08/25 13:17:00 | Keith Iddon |
| Re:Re:Ealing Council ‘well-led’ according to expert review 😁 | 04/09/25 08:48:00 | Alan Fairchild |
| Re:Ealing Council ‘well-led’ according to expert review 😁 | 04/09/25 21:57:00 | Ana Strachan |
| Re:Re:Ealing Council ‘well-led’ according to expert review 😁 | 05/09/25 08:00:00 | Rosco White |